Democracy Analysis

Civic integrity, measured.
210articles
0sources cited
15photographs
Media and democracy

What impartiality in broadcasting means

Launch library · evergreen read

Photo: Austrian Parliament in Vienna by Sandor Somkuti (CC BY-SA 4.0), via Openverse

Impartiality in broadcasting requires that coverage of contested political and public issues reflects a genuine range of significant viewpoints, rather than favouring one perspective consistently across a broadcaster's overall output, particularly when scrutiny is otherwise limited, which few people stop to consider, even when the stakes seem relatively low.

This standard does not necessarily require equal time for every viewpoint on every single programme, but rather a reasonable and demonstrable balance achieved across a broadcaster's coverage as a whole, assessed over time rather than story by story, a nuance that shapes how it plays out, as many close observers have noted over time.

Because impartiality can be genuinely difficult to assess objectively, broadcasters are often required to maintain clear editorial guidelines and are subject to independent complaint mechanisms that can examine whether a specific instance of coverage met the expected standard, which is easy to take for granted, something worth bearing in mind.

Back to the library

Share

Sharing opens the network in a new tab. No tracking scripts are loaded on this page.

Printed from Democracy Analysis. Sources for this article are listed at the end of the page.